Elicit
Finds, screens, and extracts evidence from research papers
Do not mistake the interface for the product. Elicit's durable value is data, import reliability, which a solo one-shot build cannot reproduce responsibly. The prompt therefore builds only the closest honest personal consolation tool.
Build verification: not recorded. How we judge buildability
What you give up
- citation graph scale
- team libraries and institutional access
- licensed scholarly metadata
- publisher-specific import reliability
Why people still pay
Elicit: Researchers pay for correct metadata, resilient importers, citation coverage, and workflows that survive publisher and browser changes.
Your build guide
The stack, security requirements, and agent rules for a focused replacement.
Before you start
- Node.js 22
- browser automation for user-authorized imports
- optional OpenAI API key stored in .env
- Explicit README warning that this is a consolation build, not a production replacement
Use these project rules and optional skill references alongside the prompt. Review each skill before adding it to your agent; the AGENTS.md export includes the same guidance.
Project rule, data: Model source URLs, saved items, reading state, annotations, and exports; keep stable source IDs and timestamps.
Project rule, behavior: For AI research assistant, accept a user-supplied URL or file and save its original URL, fetch time, and content hash.
Project rule, recovery: An unreachable URL keeps its bookmark and error state; duplicate imports must not discard existing highlights.
Implementation plan
Phase 1, architecture and data
Use exactly this stack: Next.js 15 + TypeScript + SQLite + Playwright. Model source URLs, saved items, reading state, annotations, and exports; keep stable source IDs and timestamps.
Phase 2, implement
For AI research assistant, accept a user-supplied URL or file and save its original URL, fetch time, and content hash.
Phase 3, implement
Extract readable content, deduplicate imports, and preserve notes or highlights by stable source position.
Phase 4, review and output
Search the saved collection and export an item with its source metadata.
Phase 5, recovery and acceptance
Verify this invariant with a saved fixture: An unreachable URL keeps its bookmark and error state; duplicate imports must not discard existing highlights. State the practical limit: citation graph scale.
Build me a focused AI research assistant workflow for the personal core of Elicit. Requirements: - Use exactly this stack: Next.js 15 + TypeScript + SQLite + Playwright. Model source URLs, saved items, reading state, annotations, and exports; keep stable source IDs and timestamps. - Paid product context: Finds, screens, and extracts evidence from research papers. Build only this DIY scope: Build a private AI research assistant workspace that imports user-supplied URLs or files, extracts metadata, supports notes, and searches the local corpus. - For AI research assistant, accept a user-supplied URL or file and save its original URL, fetch time, and content hash. - Extract readable content, deduplicate imports, and preserve notes or highlights by stable source position. - Search the saved collection and export an item with its source metadata. - Use a local web page with input, progress, review, and export views. Required input or access: browser automation for user-authorized imports; optional OpenAI API key stored in .env. Keep credentials in .env. - Acceptance: with one labelled sample, show the input, saved intermediate state, and exported result; verify this invariant: An unreachable URL keeps its bookmark and error state; duplicate imports must not discard existing highlights. - Out of scope: citation graph scale; team libraries and institutional access. Keep this a personal, inspectable workflow. - Include a README with setup, a sample input, required keys or permissions, data location, and the supported scope.
$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter), copy the prompt or copy AGENTS.md · generated from this app's build plan
prompt copied. want to know what dies next week?
new verdicts + top votes, weekly. free. one-click out.
Alternatives to building your own
CCADIMAA free systematic-review workbench; the automation is mostly humans with checklists.free↗no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real
Elicit pricing
| plan | monthly | annual (per mo) | what you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| basic | $0/user | $0/user | Unlimited search across 138M papers; unlimited full-text summaries and chat; Research Agent/report allowance is described as limited without a number. |
| plus | — | $11/user | 5 extraction columns at once; unlimited clinical-trial search; standard Research Agent usage.Annual-only: $132/year. |
| pro | $49/user | $40/user | 5× standard usage; screen up to 5,000 papers; 20 columns; up to 135 sources/report; 10 alerts.The live card displays $39/month annually but also says $480 billed yearly; $480/year equals $40/month, so the numeric field follows the billed total and records the display conflict here. |
| scale | $169/user | $89/user | 9× standard usage; 30 columns; up to 200 sources/report. |
| enterprise | — | — | Custom users, security and usage; numeric limits and price are quote-based.Contact sales. |
free tierunlimited search across 138M papers and unlimited full-text summaries/chat; numeric Research Agent/report cap is not published
billingPlus is annual-only; Pro and Scale offer monthly + annual; Enterprise quote-based
hidden costsusage is expressed as multipliers rather than a published base number; the Pro annual card conflicts with its own $480 billed-total statement
pricing sources checked 2026-08-13 · pricing source ↗
Questions about Elicit
Can you build your own Elicit with AI?
A full replacement is not the recommended project. Do not mistake the interface for the product. Elicit's durable value is data, import reliability, which a solo one-shot build cannot reproduce responsibly. The prompt therefore builds only the closest honest personal consolation tool.
What does the Elicit build prompt cover?
The prompt starts with this scope: Build a private AI research assistant workspace that imports user-supplied URLs or files, extracts metadata, supports notes, and searches the local corpus. Full-product capabilities excluded from the comparison include: citation graph scale; team libraries and institutional access; licensed scholarly metadata. Follow the implementation plan and its prerequisites before expanding the build.
How do I use the prompt, AGENTS.md and agent skills?
Start with the Elicit prerequisites and stack, then copy the prompt into your coding agent. Save the project rules as AGENTS.md in the project root. Linked skills are optional packages or source instructions for specific tasks; review their current contents and install only those matching the chosen stack. A skill does not supply API credentials or verify the finished app.
How long will this Elicit project take?
The catalogue estimate is not a true replacement; consolation build in one to two days for the limited scope. Setup, integration approvals, debugging, deployment and ongoing maintenance can add time. This is an estimate, not a delivery guarantee.
What would I give up by replacing Elicit?
citation graph scale; team libraries and institutional access; licensed scholarly metadata; publisher-specific import reliability. Elicit: Researchers pay for correct metadata, resilient importers, citation coverage, and workflows that survive publisher and browser changes.
What price is this guide comparing against?
The recorded Plus plan is $11/mo per seat (per user per month, billed annually), checked 2026-07-31. Check the linked pricing source before buying. Building your own also has hosting, API and maintenance costs; the recorded amount is not a guaranteed saving.
What can I use instead of building Elicit?
CADIMA: A free systematic-review workbench; the automation is mostly humans with checklists. Check each option's license, hosting needs and feature limits.