Screaming Frog SEO Spider
Crawl an owned site locally, inspect technical signals, and export raw audit data
The core loop is small enough for a capable coding agent to produce a useful local version in one sitting. For Screaming Frog SEO Spider, crawl an owned site locally, inspect technical signals, and export raw audit data. The hard boundary is years of crawl edge cases, javascript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance, plus crawl scale, rule depth, and operational polish.
Build verification: not recorded. How we judge buildability
What you give up
- years of crawl edge cases, JavaScript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance
- massive hosted crawl capacity
- proprietary scoring
- continuous monitoring
- agency reporting and support
Why people still pay
People still pay for Screaming Frog SEO Spider because a crawler is buildable; professionals pay for years of edge-case handling and reports they can trust with clients. The recurring cost buys robots handling, rendering, canonicalization, deduplication, crawl traps, rule maintenance, scheduling, storage, and false positives, not just the visible interface.
Your build guide
The stack, security requirements, and agent rules for a focused replacement.
Before you start
- A Python virtual environment, writable input/output directories and sufficient disk for both originals and outputs. Bind the service to localhost.
- Implementation components: Python, FastAPI and server-rendered HTML with HTMX for a local interface. SQLite for manifests and job state, with an explicit worker process and immutable source files. HTTP crawling with HTML parsing and an optional bounded Playwright renderer for user-authorized sites.
- Scope boundary: years of crawl edge cases, JavaScript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance; massive hosted crawl capacity
Use these project rules and optional skill references alongside the prompt. Review each skill before adding it to your agent; the AGENTS.md export includes the same guidance.
Optional external skill: seo-audit — Investigate crawlability, indexing, page metadata, internal linking and on-page content issues. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Optional external skill: modern-python — Set up Python projects with pyproject.toml, dependency management, linting, typing and automated checks. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Optional external skill: agent-browser — Automate browser interaction using accessibility snapshots, element references and reproducible navigation workflows. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission.
Project rule — data model: crawl frontiers, fetched/rendered snapshots, redirect chains, link edges, indexability signals and findings
Project rule — preserve this invariant: Orphan pages require an external URL inventory to establish; robots denial and fetch failure are not equivalent to noindex.
Project rule — acceptance evidence: A redirect loop terminates within a defined budget; resuming an interrupted crawl retains dated results and identifies pages not yet fetched.
Implementation plan
Phase 1
Scope and fixtures. Implement this bounded workflow: Crawl one authorized site with a fixed page/depth budget, record technical metadata and compare raw HTML with optional rendered output. Export every finding with the affected URL, evidence and a concrete remediation note. Record prerequisites, select representative user-owned fixtures and document the unsupported features: years of crawl edge cases, JavaScript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance; massive hosted crawl capacity
Phase 2
Durable model. Model crawl frontiers, fetched/rendered snapshots, redirect chains, link edges, indexability signals and findings Add migrations or a versioned document format, explicit validation, stable IDs and a visible import-error report. Preserve this rule: Orphan pages require an external URL inventory to establish; robots denial and fetch failure are not equivalent to noindex.
Phase 3
Complete the first useful path. Implement the workflow's input, review and output interface, with clear controls and explicit empty/error states. Save a job manifest with input hash, parameters and state. Write to temporary outputs, then atomically finalize only successful results; resume unfinished jobs without replacing originals.
Phase 4
Permissions and integration failure. Bound file sizes and processing time, reject path traversal, and use argument arrays for subprocesses. Treat imported text as data and redact confidential source content from logs. Constrain crawl hosts, block private-network URLs and redirect pivots, and respect crawl delays and access restrictions. Request integration credentials and permissions only for the enabled feature; show a disconnected state instead of mock results.
Phase 5
Portable handoff. Export sources, manifests and outputs with checksums. Keep failed-job diagnostics and allow retry into a new output path; restore the database and file directory together. Include setup, operating limits, fixture walkthrough and shutdown/restart instructions in the README.
Phase 6
Acceptance scenarios. A redirect loop terminates within a defined budget; resuming an interrupted crawl retains dated results and identifies pages not yet fetched. Repeat the workflow after restart and with a denied permission or unavailable dependency; show recoverable failure rather than a success placeholder.
WORKING SLICE Crawl one authorized site with a fixed page/depth budget, record technical metadata and compare raw HTML with optional rendered output. Export every finding with the affected URL, evidence and a concrete remediation note. Build this scoped Screaming Frog SEO Spider-inspired workflow with a documented data model and visible failure states. Architecture - Python, FastAPI and server-rendered HTML with HTMX for a local interface. - SQLite for manifests and job state, with an explicit worker process and immutable source files. - HTTP crawling with HTML parsing and an optional bounded Playwright renderer for user-authorized sites. Prerequisites and limits A Python virtual environment, writable input/output directories and sufficient disk for both originals and outputs. Bind the service to localhost. Outside this release: years of crawl edge cases, JavaScript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance; massive hosted crawl capacity Data model and correctness crawl frontiers, fetched/rendered snapshots, redirect chains, link edges, indexability signals and findings Invariant: Orphan pages require an external URL inventory to establish; robots denial and fetch failure are not equivalent to noindex. Save a job manifest with input hash, parameters and state. Write to temporary outputs, then atomically finalize only successful results; resume unfinished jobs without replacing originals. Security and privacy Bound file sizes and processing time, reject path traversal, and use argument arrays for subprocesses. Treat imported text as data and redact confidential source content from logs. Constrain crawl hosts, block private-network URLs and redirect pivots, and respect crawl delays and access restrictions. Recovery and export Export sources, manifests and outputs with checksums. Keep failed-job diagnostics and allow retry into a new output path; restore the database and file directory together. Implementation order 1. Phase 1 — Scope and fixtures. Implement this bounded workflow: Crawl one authorized site with a fixed page/depth budget, record technical metadata and compare raw HTML with optional rendered output. Export every finding with the affected URL, evidence and a concrete remediation note. Record prerequisites, select representative user-owned fixtures and document the unsupported features: years of crawl edge cases, JavaScript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance; massive hosted crawl capacity 2. Phase 2 — Durable model. Model crawl frontiers, fetched/rendered snapshots, redirect chains, link edges, indexability signals and findings Add migrations or a versioned document format, explicit validation, stable IDs and a visible import-error report. Preserve this rule: Orphan pages require an external URL inventory to establish; robots denial and fetch failure are not equivalent to noindex. 3. Phase 3 — Complete the first useful path. Implement the workflow's input, review and output interface, with clear controls and explicit empty/error states. Save a job manifest with input hash, parameters and state. Write to temporary outputs, then atomically finalize only successful results; resume unfinished jobs without replacing originals. 4. Phase 4 — Permissions and integration failure. Bound file sizes and processing time, reject path traversal, and use argument arrays for subprocesses. Treat imported text as data and redact confidential source content from logs. Constrain crawl hosts, block private-network URLs and redirect pivots, and respect crawl delays and access restrictions. Request integration credentials and permissions only for the enabled feature; show a disconnected state instead of mock results. 5. Phase 5 — Portable handoff. Export sources, manifests and outputs with checksums. Keep failed-job diagnostics and allow retry into a new output path; restore the database and file directory together. Include setup, operating limits, fixture walkthrough and shutdown/restart instructions in the README. 6. Phase 6 — Acceptance scenarios. A redirect loop terminates within a defined budget; resuming an interrupted crawl retains dated results and identifies pages not yet fetched. Repeat the workflow after restart and with a denied permission or unavailable dependency; show recoverable failure rather than a success placeholder. Acceptance A redirect loop terminates within a defined budget; resuming an interrupted crawl retains dated results and identifies pages not yet fetched. Use real source data or clearly labeled fixtures. Explain unsupported input and provider failures; do not fabricate analytics, delivery receipts, accuracy claims or security guarantees. Optional agent guidance Optional external skill: [seo-audit](https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/blob/main/skills/seo-audit/SKILL.md) — Investigate crawlability, indexing, page metadata, internal linking and on-page content issues. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission. Optional external skill: [modern-python](https://github.com/trailofbits/skills/blob/main/plugins/modern-python/skills/modern-python/SKILL.md) — Set up Python projects with pyproject.toml, dependency management, linting, typing and automated checks. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission. Optional external skill: [agent-browser](https://github.com/vercel-labs/agent-browser/blob/main/skills/agent-browser/SKILL.md) — Automate browser interaction using accessibility snapshots, element references and reproducible navigation workflows. Review its instructions and compatibility before use; it does not grant deployment, data-access or publication permission. Project rule — data model: crawl frontiers, fetched/rendered snapshots, redirect chains, link edges, indexability signals and findings Project rule — preserve this invariant: Orphan pages require an external URL inventory to establish; robots denial and fetch failure are not equivalent to noindex. Project rule — acceptance evidence: A redirect loop terminates within a defined budget; resuming an interrupted crawl retains dated results and identifies pages not yet fetched.
$ open in your agent (prompt prefilled, you press enter), copy the prompt or copy or download AGENTS.md · generated from this app's build plan
prompt copied. want to know what dies next week?
new verdicts + top votes, weekly. free. one-click out.
Alternatives to building your own
all 6 free alternatives to Screaming Frog SEO Spider →· no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real
Screaming Frog SEO Spider pricing
| plan | monthly | annual (per mo) | what you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| free | $0/user | $0/user | 500 URLs per crawl. |
| seo spider licence (1–4 users) | — | $23.55/user | Unlimited URLs subject to local memory/storage; 1 licence per user.Annual-only licence billed at €245/user/year. Published in EUR; converted at the ECB 2026-08-13 reference rate of EUR 1 = USD 1.1534. |
| seo spider licence (5–9 users) | — | $22.59/user | Unlimited URLs subject to local memory/storage; volume price applies per user.Annual-only licence billed at €235/user/year. Published in EUR; converted at the ECB 2026-08-13 reference rate of EUR 1 = USD 1.1534. |
| seo spider licence (10–19 users) | — | $21.05/user | Unlimited URLs subject to local memory/storage; volume price applies per user.Annual-only licence billed at €219/user/year. Published in EUR; converted at the ECB 2026-08-13 reference rate of EUR 1 = USD 1.1534. |
| seo spider licence (20+ users) | — | $20.09/user | Unlimited URLs subject to local memory/storage; volume price applies per user.Annual-only licence billed at €209/user/year. Published in EUR; converted at the ECB 2026-08-13 reference rate of EUR 1 = USD 1.1534. |
free tier500 URLs per crawl
billingfree version + annual-only paid licences; no monthly paid plan
hidden costsEvery user needs a separate licence; 'unlimited' paid crawls are still constrained by the computer's RAM and storage.
pricing sources checked 2026-08-14 · pricing source ↗
Questions about Screaming Frog SEO Spider
Can you build your own Screaming Frog SEO Spider with AI?
The verdict is yes for the scoped workflow. The core loop is small enough for a capable coding agent to produce a useful local version in one sitting. For Screaming Frog SEO Spider, crawl an owned site locally, inspect technical signals, and export raw audit data. The hard boundary is years of crawl edge cases, javascript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance, plus crawl scale, rule depth, and operational polish.
What does the Screaming Frog SEO Spider build prompt cover?
The prompt starts with this scope: Crawl one authorized site with a fixed page/depth budget, record technical metadata and compare raw HTML with optional rendered output. Export every finding with the affected URL, evidence and a concrete remediation note. Full-product capabilities excluded from the comparison include: years of crawl edge cases, JavaScript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance; massive hosted crawl capacity; proprietary scoring. Follow the implementation plan and its prerequisites before expanding the build.
How do I use the prompt, AGENTS.md and agent skills?
Start with the Screaming Frog SEO Spider prerequisites and stack, then copy the prompt into your coding agent. Save the project rules as AGENTS.md in the project root. Linked skills are optional packages or source instructions for specific tasks; review their current contents and install only those matching the chosen stack. A skill does not supply API credentials or verify the finished app.
How long will this Screaming Frog SEO Spider project take?
The catalogue estimate is multi-day for the limited scope. Setup, integration approvals, debugging, deployment and ongoing maintenance can add time. This is an estimate, not a delivery guarantee.
What would I give up by replacing Screaming Frog SEO Spider?
years of crawl edge cases, JavaScript rendering, integrations, and desktop performance; massive hosted crawl capacity; proprietary scoring; continuous monitoring; agency reporting and support. People still pay for Screaming Frog SEO Spider because a crawler is buildable; professionals pay for years of edge-case handling and reports they can trust with clients. The recurring cost buys robots handling, rendering, canonicalization, deduplication, crawl traps, rule maintenance, scheduling, storage, and false positives, not just the visible interface.
What price is this guide comparing against?
The recorded SEO Spider licence (1–4 users) plan is $23.55/mo per seat (annual billing, per user per month), checked 2026-08-14. Check the linked pricing source before buying. Building your own also has hosting, API and maintenance costs; the recorded amount is not a guaranteed saving.
What can I use instead of building Screaming Frog SEO Spider?
SiteOne Crawler: A proper cross-platform crawler with JavaScript rendering, reports and raw exports; no license key hiding under the lily pad. LibreCrawl: An unlimited browser-based crawler with JavaScript rendering; free, capable and one Docker stack away from useful. SEOnaut: A workmanlike crawler with issue severity, audit history and exports; less microscope, more dependable checklist. Compare all listed options at https://howtovibecodeit.dev/screaming-frog-seo-spider/alternatives. Check each option's license, hosting needs and feature limits.